Evaluation of Various Scoring Systems in Predicting the Outcome in Patients of Perforation Peritonitis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Aim & Objectives: Prospective study to evaluate the mortality prediction in patients with perforation peritonitis using APACHE II, SAPS II, MODS, SOFA and MPI scoring systems. Material and Methods: One hundred patients of hollow viscus perforation peritonitis, from October 2012 – June 2014, were evaluated preoperatively using above mentioned scores and outcome noted in terms of mortality; thereafter, accuracy of the five systems in predicting mortality evaluated. Results: Of the hundred 100 patients, 31 died. Higher age, late presentation, female gender and colonic perforation carried higher mortality; ARDS was the most common complication. It was observed that higher the score, higher was the mortality. More so, APACHE II scores 16-25, SAPS II 40-59, MPI 22-29, MODS 5-8 and SOFA 7-12 correlated significantly (p<0.5) with the predicted outcome. Conclusion: Among the 5 scoring systems, APACHE II, SAPS II & MPI showed less observed mortality rate than predicted percentage at lower scores and higher observed mortality rate than predicted percentage at higher scores; whereas MODS and SOFA showed a much higher observed rate as compared to predicted rate, overall. In all the scoring systems there was a linear increase in death rate with increase in scores.
منابع مشابه
Efficacy of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) Score in Patients with Secondary Peritonitis.
BACKGROUND Despite advances in diagnosis, management and critical care of patients with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation, prognosis remains poor. Early assessment by scoring systems will influence the management and prognosis. AIM Evaluation of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) score for predicting the outcome in patients with peritonitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prospective study ...
متن کاملEvaluation of Mannheim Peritonitis Index in Predicting the Prognosis of Hollow Viscus Perforation
Background: Peritonitis due to hollow viscous perforation continues to be one of the most common surgical emergencies and a potentially life threatening condition attended by a surgeon on emergency duty. Its accurate diagnosis and management is still a challenge to surgeons worldwide. A scoring system should be able to assess the need, type, and quality of the care required for a particular pat...
متن کاملPrognostic scoring indicator in evaluation of clinical outcome in intestinal perforations.
INTRODUCTION Acute generalised peritonitis coming forth due to underlying intestinal perforation is a critical & life-threatening medical condition. It is a common surgical emergency most of the times across the world. Misleading data on crude morbidity and mortality due to the condition usually contaminates substantially the very purpose of medical audit. Thus, early prognostic evaluation is n...
متن کاملScoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer
BACKGROUND Patients with perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) often present with acute, severe illness that carries a high risk for morbidity and mortality. Mortality ranges from 3-40% and several prognostic scoring systems have been suggested. The aim of this study was to review the available scoring systems for PPU patients, and to assert if there is evidence to prefer one to the other. MATERIAL A...
متن کاملMannheim Peritonitis Index and APACHE II--prediction of outcome in patients with peritonitis.
BACKGROUND Early prognostic evaluation of patients with peritonitis is desirable to select high-risk patients for intensive management and also to provide a reliable objective classification of severity and operative risk. This study attempts to evaluate the use of scoring systems such as Acute Physiological and Chronic Health Evaluation score (APACHE II) and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) in...
متن کامل